Proposed changes to the American Association of Physicists in Medicine governance

Todd Pawlicki,¹ Rex G. Ayers,² Kristy K. Brock,³ Jessica B. Clements,⁴ Bruce H. Curran,⁵ James T. Dobbins,⁶ Ehsan Samei,⁶ Eva Adams,⁷ Melissa Carol Martin,⁸ Lisa Schober^9
1University of California, San Diego, CA; ²Northwest Medical Physics Center, Lynnwood, WA; ³University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; ⁴Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, CA; ⁵Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA; ⁶Duke University, Durham, NC; ⁷TG-281; ⁸Therapy Physics, Inc., Signal Hill, CA; ⁹AAPM, Columbia, MD

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 18, 4 (2017).

This issue’s invited Editorial is provided by Todd Pawlicki, AAPM Secretary and Chair of Task Group No. 281, Governance Assessment Communications Plan. This is an opinion article and as such does not necessarily reflect the views and position of the JACMP EIC leadership team nor those of the JACMP Board of Editors. It is being provided to inform the medical physics community of the work andsentiments of TG-281 and to assist the AAPM membership in its decision respecting the upcoming vote on this topic. –Michael Mills, JACMP EIC